Code Security Audit

Secure code review built for AI-generated codebases.

A Galen©-powered source code audit that finds the authorization gaps, insecure defaults, and unsafe patterns SAST tools miss — with proof for every finding and a validated fix. Galen© is Telhawk's AI security reviewer; Telhawk does not run human code audits.

Scope a code audit See managed engagements

What gets reviewed

Where real risk hides in a modern codebase

A code security audit only matters if it covers the layers that decide whether an attacker — or an honest user — can reach data and actions they shouldn't.

Authorization & access control

Object ownership, tenant boundaries, role checks, and privilege escalation paths across every route, function, and background job.

AI-generated code patterns

Insecure defaults, hallucinated APIs, unsafe library usage, missing input validation, and copy-paste duplication that SAST tools miss.

Data flow & trust boundaries

Where untrusted input reaches sinks: SQL, shell, deserialization, template rendering, file paths, and outbound HTTP.

Secrets, dependencies & CI

Hardcoded credentials, leaked tokens, vulnerable dependencies, and build pipelines that ship unreviewed code to production.

Why Telhawk

Secure code review, not SAST output forwarded.

Most code audit services hand you a tool report with a logo on it. Telhawk reviews code the way an attacker reads it — by following data, identity, and trust — and proves every issue before you spend a sprint on it.

Proof, not pattern matches

Every finding ships with a reproducible path. If we can't prove it, we don't report it.

Built for AI-generated code

We know how GPT-5, Claude, and Copilot fail. Authorization gaps and unsafe defaults are the default — not the exception.

Validated remediation

We re-test every fix. The audit ends when the paths are actually closed, not when the PDF is signed.

Deliverables

What you get from a Telhawk code audit

Proof-backed finding report with reproduction steps for every issue

Severity scored against business impact, not generic CVSS

File, line, and call-path references for fast remediation

Remediation guidance written for the team that owns the code

Validation round that confirms every fix actually closes the path

Who it's for

Teams that ask for a code security audit

AI-first engineering teams

Shipping code written largely by GPT, Claude, Copilot, or Gemini and needing an independent AI security reviewer — Galen© — to confirm the authorization and data-handling layers are sound.

Series A–C SaaS

Preparing for SOC 2, customer security review, or enterprise procurement and need an external secure code review on the codebase.

Engineering leaders post-incident

Needing an independent source code audit to find related issues, not just the one that was exploited.

FAQ

Common questions about secure code review

How long does a code security audit take?

Most Telhawk managed code security audits are completed in 5–7 business days after scope, access, and required materials are confirmed. Timing may vary for larger codebases, complex API flows, AI-agent workflows, or expanded review scope.

What languages and stacks do you cover?

Telhawk reviews common modern application stacks, including TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java, C#, Node.js, Next.js, FastAPI, API services, AI application workflows, MCP servers, and AI-agent integrations. If your stack is not listed, Telhawk can review it during scoping.

Do I get proof or just a list of findings?

Telhawk focuses on proof-backed findings, not raw scan output. Where applicable, findings include affected paths, relevant data flows, missing controls, risk context, remediation guidance, and validation status after correction.

Ready for a proof-backed code audit?

Telhawk reviews source code with the depth a real attacker would — and proves every finding before you spend engineering time on it.

Talk to an expert See API security audit

→ Managed Security Audit → Direct Security Audit → Methodology