Cut scanner noise. Validate what's actually exploitable.
Telhawk takes scanner output, bug-bounty reports, and inherited findings and confirms which are real, which are reachable, and which fixes actually close the path.
Findings worth fixing, separated from noise
Scanners over-report. Bug-bounty triage drains engineering time. Telhawk validation gives you the short list of issues that matter — with proof attached to each.
Determine which scanner or bug-bounty findings are actually reachable, exploitable, and material in your environment — not theoretical.
Cut through SAST, DAST, and SCA noise so engineering only sees the issues that warrant a sprint.
Re-test after fixes to confirm the path is closed, not just that the scanner went quiet. Validation status tracked per finding.
Severity scored against business impact, blast radius, and tenant exposure — so the riskiest issues land at the top.
Validation that engineering teams can act on.
What you get from a Telhawk validation engagement
Common questions about vulnerability validation
Vulnerability validation confirms whether a reported vulnerability is real, exploitable in your environment, and how. It removes false positives from scanner output and gives engineering teams proof to prioritize against.
A scanner produces a list of potential issues. Validation determines which of those are actually exploitable in your context, with reproducible evidence. The output is a short list of confirmed risks, not a long list of maybes.
Yes. Telhawk re-tests after remediation to confirm the path is actually closed — not just that the scanner stopped flagging it. Validation status is tracked per finding.
Telhawk validates which findings are real, prioritizes by business impact, and confirms every fix.